<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Varied Technology Links (only a little zen)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zenofnptech.org/2006/10/varied-technolo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zenofnptech.org/2006/10/varied-technolo.html</link>
	<description>Thoughtful and sometimes snarky perspectives on nonprofit technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Murrain</title>
		<link>http://www.zenofnptech.org/2006/10/varied-technolo.html/comment-page-1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Murrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenofnptech.com/?p=45#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I don't think this is FUD, from what I read. My understanding is that Vista is supposed to be different than XP - a lot more limited and locked down than XP has been (which was a lot more limited and locked down than 2000 ...)

I haven't read the EULA itself - but here is the relevant quote: "The first user of the software may reassign the license to another device one time." This sounds quite different than the activation issue. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is FUD, from what I read. My understanding is that Vista is supposed to be different than XP - a lot more limited and locked down than XP has been (which was a lot more limited and locked down than 2000 &#8230;)</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the EULA itself - but here is the relevant quote: &#8220;The first user of the software may reassign the license to another device one time.&#8221; This sounds quite different than the activation issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zenofnptech.org/2006/10/varied-technolo.html/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenofnptech.com/?p=45#comment-43</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; if you upgrade your computer more than once, you'll have to pay. So if you are a hardware geek, expect to pay MS every other time you get a new motherboard &lt;&lt;

Is this referring to activation?  If so, this is FUD.  I have used the same CD key to reinstall a single copy of XP multiple times through 3 successive complete machine replacements.  As long as you don't use the same key to activate multiple Windows copies in a single short period of time (read: post the key on Usenet), my experience is that activation has been pretty nonintrusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> if you upgrade your computer more than once, you&#8217;ll have to pay. So if you are a hardware geek, expect to pay MS every other time you get a new motherboard <<</p>
<p>Is this referring to activation?  If so, this is FUD.  I have used the same CD key to reinstall a single copy of XP multiple times through 3 successive complete machine replacements.  As long as you don&#8217;t use the same key to activate multiple Windows copies in a single short period of time (read: post the key on Usenet), my experience is that activation has been pretty nonintrusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
