Gender, Race and Open Source
June 29th, 2007 | Published in Open Source
My session on Free and Open Source software and the US Social Forum went great yesterday. Lots of people were there (I ran out of handouts - I was surprised to see how many people showed up.) The presentation is available on my wiki (it’s at the bottom.)
There were a very wide range of people there, from folks who didn’t know a whole lot about open source, to those who were developing open source apps. Toward the end, a young man, who worked with urban kids of color on media and music, commented that he didn’t really know how to get access to the kinds of things available, and he noticed how few people of color were in the room. He wanted to know how to get his kids access to tools that were affordable for them to create and edit media.
An older woman of color noted that a lot of the problems that open source developers were solving weren’t problems that communities faced. Which, of course, has been an issue for me for a long time - lack of open source alternatives in the "vertical" application spaces - case management, etc. But it even goes further than just the vertical apps - what "itches" predominantly white, privileged (and, I might add, mostly young) men? And aren’t those different that the issues other groups of people face? This is not, of course, to suggest that there have been no efforts to produce software that addresses social and human needs - there have been a lot. But their number pale in comparison to, say, the plethora of, say, network sniffing tools, for instance.
There was an interesting mini-conversation, which, in retrospect, I really wish I’d had a chance to explore more, about the supposed "egalitarian" nature of free and open source software development. One person had brought up the idea of open source as a model for egalitarian participatory economics, and I made a brief comment that it wasn’t all that egalitarian, really. My experience, and the experiences of many women who are involved in open source, make this clear.
Both of these things have lead me to think a lot about this topic. Of course, as an African American woman, I am a pretty unusual spokesperson for free and open source software. I most often find myself in a room full of people who are not at all like me (at least in the realm of identity - in actuality, they are a lot like me in inclination, but that’s a different conversation.) There were about 35 people in the room for the session, and about 8 were women, and about 7 or 8 were people of color (with overlap between the two - probably 25-28 out of 35 were white men.) This was the most diverse crowd I’ve ever talked with or been in for an open source conversation. That speaks volumes to me. It is also true that it was far from a representative sample of people here at the US Social Forum (which is way more female and of color than that group.)
I don’t really have any easy answers to this, but it makes me think more about what I’m seeing as a gap, at least here in the US. We have a collectively-owned, freely available set of tools that are usable, and useful, and can even be used on older hardware. And communities that could make use of, expand, extend, and take ownership of these tools, don’t have access to them, for a wide variety of reasons that at some point I should articulate, but have little to do with money directly. This feels like a different part of the digital divide. It’s not just about access to resources in an economic sense.
Unfortunately, none of this is especially simple to address. But it needs addressing.