<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tidbits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zenofnptech.org/2008/02/tidbits-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zenofnptech.org/2008/02/tidbits-2.html</link>
	<description>Thoughtful and sometimes snarky perspectives on nonprofit technology</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dustin J Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.zenofnptech.org/2008/02/tidbits-2.html#comment-5101</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin J Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenofnptech.org/2008/02/tidbits-2.html#comment-5101</guid>
		<description>SourceForge has been terrible since the beginning.  I've never understood why they rolled their own everything -- forums, mailing list archives (at least they use Mailman for the list manager), bug tracking, etc.  I guess that would be OK if they had done a great job with those things, but all of them are nearly impossible to use, especially when SF is having a "slow day" (which is most days).  They just introduced a project wiki, but again, they've rolled their own and it's useless.  Contrast that with Google Code's sweet Subversion-integrated wiki.

The problem with Google Code is that it's *explicitly* for small projects.  It's not intended to scale up to the proportions one would need for a major project like Python or Amanda.  Also, to be fair, SourceForge supplies a lot more "raw resources" to its projects -- web space, databases, login servers, compile farms, and so on.  Depending on the project, those can be really useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SourceForge has been terrible since the beginning.  I&#8217;ve never understood why they rolled their own everything &#8212; forums, mailing list archives (at least they use Mailman for the list manager), bug tracking, etc.  I guess that would be OK if they had done a great job with those things, but all of them are nearly impossible to use, especially when SF is having a &#8220;slow day&#8221; (which is most days).  They just introduced a project wiki, but again, they&#8217;ve rolled their own and it&#8217;s useless.  Contrast that with Google Code&#8217;s sweet Subversion-integrated wiki.</p>
<p>The problem with Google Code is that it&#8217;s *explicitly* for small projects.  It&#8217;s not intended to scale up to the proportions one would need for a major project like Python or Amanda.  Also, to be fair, SourceForge supplies a lot more &#8220;raw resources&#8221; to its projects &#8212; web space, databases, login servers, compile farms, and so on.  Depending on the project, those can be really useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
